Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Ocean |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than OPPO Find X2's 79.7 overall score. Despite of the fact that Apple iPhone X is way older than OPPO Find X2, it's design is a little thinner and a little bit lighter. The Apple iPhone X counts with a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Find X2, because although it has an inferior number of cores and they are also slower and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a little bit better looking display than iPhone X, because it has a little bit more pixels per display inch, a larger display, a better 1440 x 3168px resolution and a brighter screen. OPPO Find X2's memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as the Apple iPhone X one, both of them have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 2716mAh. The OPPO Find X2 features a better camera than iPhone X, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 also has a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.