Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Ocean |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, having an 88.1 score against 83.1. The iPhone X body is lighter and thinner than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Apple iPhone X counts with a bit faster processor than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM and less and slower processing cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit more vivid display than iPhone X, because it has a better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution, a brighter screen, a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a larger display. The OPPO Find X2 Pro takes better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture, a camera with much more megapixels and a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone X, because it has 512 GB internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.