Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting an 88.1 score against 77. The iPhone X is a a little lighter cellphone than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, but both of them are equally thin. Apple iPhone X features a bit better screen than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has much worse brightness and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a little bit greater pixels amount per inch in the display.
The iPhone X has a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has 9 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G and Apple iPhone X have very similar memory capacity for apps and games, both have the same internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a much better camera than iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera. The Apple iPhone X has a way better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.