Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2021-12-03 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G's 82.1 overall score. IPhone X is an a lot older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, but Apple managed to build it thinner and somewhat lighter. IPhone X features a better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Apple iPhone X counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a way better quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy A13 5G shoots just a bit better photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution.
IPhone X features much more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A13 5G has a very superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.