Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2023-12-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than the Galaxy A15 5G, having a general score of 88.1 against 77.4. The iPhone X body is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than the Galaxy A15 5G, even though it was released 6 years before. IPhone X has a lot better performance than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory and less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone X has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has way more opaque display and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a bit better quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a bit better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone X, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A15 5G counts with a much better battery life than iPhone X, because it has an 84% bigger battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A15 5G. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A15 5G, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.