Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-10-05 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 463 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.17 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than Samsung Galaxy A20s, getting an 88.1 score against 77. The iPhone X construction is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy A20s, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before. IPhone X counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a much better count of pixels per screen inch.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a greater hardware performance than Galaxy A20s, because although it has less CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. The iPhone X features a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Apple iPhone X features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser megapixels, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a lot higher video definition and a lot larger sensor. The Galaxy A20s counts with a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.