Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2021-07-02 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than the Galaxy A22, getting a general score of 88.1 against 76.1. Even though the iPhone X is a lot older than the Galaxy A22, it's construction is just a little lighter and a bit thinner. The iPhone X features a better hardware performance than Galaxy A22, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and lesser cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone X features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A22, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1125 x 2436 resolution and much more pixels per inch of screen. IPhone X has a bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A22, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The iPhone X captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a camera with lot less MP, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the iPhone X also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution. The iPhone X features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.