Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is just a bit better than the Galaxy A22 5G, getting an 88.1 score against 84.6. IPhone X is an much older cellphone than Galaxy A22 5G, but it is somewhat lighter and thinner anyway. The iPhone X counts with a better performance than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has lesser CPU cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone X features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density and a bit higher 1125 x 2436px resolution. The iPhone X features a little bit better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G captures a bit better videos and photos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.