Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is better than the Galaxy A25 5G's global score of 79.9. Even though Apple iPhone X is much older than Galaxy A25 5G, it's body is just a bit thinner and lighter. Apple iPhone X counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and way less brightness, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a quite better screen pixels density.
The Galaxy A25 5G has more memory to install applications and games than Apple iPhone X, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB. The iPhone X has an extremely better processor than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and 3 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a very superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has an 84 percent bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a bigger sensor taking better quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.