Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A31's 81.3 general score. The Apple iPhone X body is just a little bit lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A31, even though it was released 3 years before. The Apple iPhone X features a bit better screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density and a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution.
Apple iPhone X has a faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor. Galaxy A31 takes slightly better photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution and a lot bigger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The Apple iPhone X features a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A31, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A31 features a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.