Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-11-03 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.14 ounces | -- |
| Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A34's 82.9 overall score. Apple iPhone X has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has lesser RAM memory and less and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone X features just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436. The iPhone X has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The iPhone X features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A34, although it has a way smaller camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors and a camera with a way worse resolution, they both have a same size camera aperture. The Galaxy A34 has a very superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has an 84 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.