Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than the Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 general score. The iPhone X is an notably older cellphone than the Galaxy A35 5G, but it's a little bit thinner and lighter anyway. IPhone X has a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density, a little bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a little bit brighter display.
The iPhone X has a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 2 less cpu cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone X has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G takes better photographs and videos than iPhone X, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.