Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Prism cube black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than iPhone X's overall score of 88.1. The Galaxy A51 5G design is way newer than iPhone X's, although it's a little heavier and thicker. IPhone X has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 2 less CPU cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone X counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better count of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better 1125 x 2436px resolution. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G takes better pictures and videos than iPhone X, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2716mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.