Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is just a bit better than the iPhone X's 88.1 overall score. Galaxy A52s's body is notably newer, but a little bit thicker and a little heavier than iPhone X. The iPhone X counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A52s, because although it has less RAM and an inferior number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display and a little higher resolution of 1125 x 2436. The Samsung Galaxy A52s shoots better photographs and videos than iPhone X, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more mega pixels back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone X, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52s counts with a way better battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.