Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| 2017-11-03 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 10.17 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than Samsung Galaxy A6, having an 88.1 score against 75.8. The iPhone X design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A6, but it is just a little bit heavier. The iPhone X counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a bit larger display, a lot higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a much higher number of pixels per inch in the display.
IPhone X has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The iPhone X counts with a superior hardware performance than Galaxy A6, because although it has less cpu cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone X also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone X captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting lower quality videos and pictures, a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and video and a back facing camera with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a much better video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A6 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 10% bigger battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A6. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A6, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.