Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's global score of 76.9. IPhone X's design is just a little thinner and just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it was released around 18 months before. The iPhone X counts with a superior performance than Galaxy A70, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The iPhone X features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a little better screen pixel density. The iPhone X shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the iPhone X also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Galaxy A70 has a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games than iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 66 percent more battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone X, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A70, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.