Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A71, with a score of 88.1 against 87.5. IPhone X's design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A71, but it is just a little lighter. Apple iPhone X has a brighter display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a little bit higher screen density.
IPhone X counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A71, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Galaxy A71 features a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A71 features a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh. The Galaxy A71 features a way better camera than iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A71, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A71. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A71, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.