Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Prism bricks black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is a little bit better than the Apple iPhone X, getting a general score of 92.9 against 88.1. Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction is newer than the Apple iPhone X's, but it's just a little thicker and just a bit heavier. Apple iPhone X features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a bit greater pixel count in each inch of screen.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a better memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. The Apple iPhone X has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has lesser and slower processing cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 66 percent bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW takes greater photographs and videos than iPhone X, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.