Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-11-03 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | -- |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Yes GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G's general score of 80.5. Apple iPhone X is a just a bit lighter device than the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, but both have the same thickness. The Apple iPhone X has a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A73 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone X features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, because although it has way less brightness and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixels density and a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution. The Galaxy A73 5G counts with a greater memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G takes just a bit better photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G also has a camera in the back with a lot better resolution. Galaxy A73 5G has a much longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.