Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-11-03 | 2016-06-01 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 10.17 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X is better than the Samsung Galaxy C5, with a general score of 88.1 against 76.4. The iPhone X is a newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy C5, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier. The iPhone X counts with a faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has 2 less cpu cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy C5, because it has a little bit bigger display, a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. The Apple iPhone X has a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy C5, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The iPhone X has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a way less MP camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition. The iPhone X has just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 4 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.