Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-11-03 | 2016-06-01 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy C7's 77.7 global score. Although iPhone X is newer than Samsung Galaxy C7, it is just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. Apple iPhone X features a faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
IPhone X features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a little bigger display, a just a bit greater pixel number in each screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. The iPhone X counts with much more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy C7 counts with superior battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 22% greater battery capacity. The Apple iPhone X features a much better camera than Galaxy C7, because although it has a much worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.