Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-11-03 | 2017-04-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Blue and Gold |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro's 78.4 global score. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, it must be told that it is also just a bit thicker and a bit heavier. IPhone X has a superior performance than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has less cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The iPhone X has a more vivid screen than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a little bit greater display pixels density, a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a bit bigger screen. The iPhone X takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a back camera with lot less MP resolution, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture.
IPhone X has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy C7 Pro has improved battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.