Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2022-03-22 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | -- |
| Silver and Space gray | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy F23's score of 84.6. The iPhone X counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a just a little greater pixels density.
The iPhone X has a better CPU than Galaxy F23, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Apple iPhone X takes a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a way less mega-pixels camera, they both have a same size aperture.
The Apple iPhone X has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F23, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy F23 has a way better battery life than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.