Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-10-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy F41's 85.2 score. IPhone X is an notably older cellphone than the Galaxy F41, but Apple was able to make it just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner. The Apple iPhone X features a little sharper display than Galaxy F41, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixel density, a brighter screen and a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution.
IPhone X counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy F41, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. IPhone X features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy F41 features a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh. The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a superior camera than iPhone X, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a much larger sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.