Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy F62's global score of 88.1. IPhone X is an noticeably older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy F62, but it is notably lighter and thinner anyway. Apple iPhone X counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy F62, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a higher number of cores.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a brighter screen, a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436px. The Galaxy F62 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone X, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Galaxy F62 takes much better photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.