Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is better than the iPhone X, getting a 97.6 score against 88.1. Samsung Galaxy Fold is a newer and a little bit thinner cellphone than iPhone X, although it's incredibly heavier. Apple iPhone X counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1125 x 2436px, it also counts with a better count of pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone X, because it has more internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone X has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Fold, because although it has less RAM memory and 2 lesser and slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better camera than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy Fold also has a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way more expensive than the iPhone X, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.