Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2017-11-03 | 2017-06-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than Galaxy J7 Max's 76.1 score. Even though iPhone X and Galaxy J7 Max were released only a couple of months apart, iPhone X is a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. The iPhone X features a much better looking screen than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a just a bit higher pixel density, a quite larger screen and a quite better 1125 x 2436px resolution.
The Apple iPhone X features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has 2 less processing cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. IPhone X features a superior camera than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and a worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The iPhone X has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Max features greater battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.