Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2021-03-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, blue and white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | PLS |
| 463 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is much better than the Samsung Galaxy M12, with an 88.1 score against 80. Apple iPhone X's body is extremely lighter and incredibly thinner than Samsung Galaxy M12, although it was released 3 years before. Apple iPhone X has a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone X has a lot better looking display than Galaxy M12, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a much higher pixel count per inch of screen. The Apple iPhone X features a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M12, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy M12 features just a bit better camera than iPhone X, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not good for taking pictures or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M12 also counts with a lot better resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy M12 features a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 121 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.