Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2022-07-01 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G52 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy M13's 81.1 global score. Apple iPhone X is an incredibly older cellphone than the Galaxy M13, but Apple could make it just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. The Apple iPhone X counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy M13, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
IPhone X counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy M13, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. Apple iPhone X features a much better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy M13, because it has 192 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy M13 features a superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Apple iPhone X shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy M13, although it has a much lower resolution camera in the back, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.