Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-06-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is slightly better than the Galaxy M40, having a general score of 88.1 against 85. IPhone X's design is a bit thinner than Galaxy M40, although it is just a little heavier and was released around a year before. IPhone X counts with a more powerful processor than Galaxy M40, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone X features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M40, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a little higher number of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy M40 features a little bit more storage for games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy M40 has better battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 3500mAh battery size. The Galaxy M40 has a little bit better camera than iPhone X, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy M40 also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera, a larger sensor capturing better quality videos and photos and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.