Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 463 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M51, with a global score of 88.1 against 87.7. IPhone X is an incredibly older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy M51, but it is lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The iPhone X features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little bit higher screen density.
Galaxy M51 features just a bit more memory to install games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The iPhone X features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy M51, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a much better camera than iPhone X, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a much larger back camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.