Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2022-04-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G's 76.7 global score. Apple iPhone X is a much older and a little thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, but Apple managed to make it a bit lighter anyway. The iPhone X counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little greater pixels count per inch in the screen.
IPhone X has a very superior processing power than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The iPhone X has a superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy M53 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy M53 5G has a little bit better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a lot tinier sensor shooting much worse quality videos and images, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy M53 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution. Galaxy M53 5G counts with a superior battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.