Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is better than Apple iPhone X's 88.1 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a noticeably newer phone than Apple iPhone X, but it is just a little thicker and heavier. Apple iPhone X counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little bit smaller display, a quite lower screen pixel density and a lot worse 1125 x 2436 resolution.
Apple iPhone X features just a little better performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has 9 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes way better videos and photos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much higher video definition, a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a lot larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a bit more money than the iPhone X, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.