Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.72 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note 3's 81.2 general score. Even though iPhone X is a little bit heavier than Galaxy Note 3, it's just a little bit thinner and also extremely newer. Apple iPhone X has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a 64-bits processor and more processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 and Apple iPhone X count with similar displays, although the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little bit worse screen density, a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a bit smaller screen. The Apple iPhone X captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a camera with lesser megapixels resolution and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a larger aperture for better low-light photos.
Apple iPhone X counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy Note 3 has greater battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has an 18 percent greater battery size.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy Note 3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.