Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2017-11-03 | 2018-01-09 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | TFT |
| 463 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 10.17 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than the Galaxy On7 Prime's 76.9 overall score. Although iPhone X and Galaxy On7 Prime were released only 2 months apart, the iPhone X design is just a little thinner but a bit heavier than Galaxy On7 Prime. Apple iPhone X features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a little larger screen, a quite higher pixel count in each inch in the display and a little higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels.
The iPhone X features a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. IPhone X features a superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has 2 less cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Galaxy On7 Prime has better battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh. IPhone X shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution, a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and videos and a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.