Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X is a bit better than the Galaxy S10e, getting a score of 88.1 against 86.3. The iPhone X is an older and heavier phone than Galaxy S10e, but Apple was able to build it just a bit thinner anyway. The iPhone X has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S10e, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone X features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Apple iPhone X also has a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a bit better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy S10e has just a bit better camera than iPhone X, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same resolution camera and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a larger aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Galaxy S10e has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone X, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S10e features a bit longer battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 3100mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S10e, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S10e. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone X, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy S10e, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.