Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than Apple iPhone X's 88.1 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE design is newer, but a bit heavier and a little thicker than the Apple iPhone X. IPhone X has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a little bit higher display density.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a greater storage to install games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Apple iPhone X has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE takes slightly better photographs and videos than iPhone X, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same video definition, a camera in the back with a 12 megapixels and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
Galaxy S20 FE features a way better battery life than iPhone X, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 FE is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.