Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is better than iPhone X's global score of 88.1. Although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is newer than the iPhone X, it is thicker and heavier. The Apple iPhone X counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a lot lower 1125 x 2436px resolution, a just a bit worse screen density and a bit smaller display.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has more storage to install applications and games than iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better battery duration than iPhone X, because it has an 84 percent bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs more money than the Apple iPhone X, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.