Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2022-01-11 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a little bit better than iPhone X, with an 89.1 score against 88.1. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE body is way newer and just a little bit lighter than the iPhone X's, although it's also just a little bit thicker. The Apple iPhone X counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has 2 lesser and slower CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone X features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density and a slightly higher 1125 x 2436px resolution. The iPhone X features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE features a very superior battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 66 percent larger battery size. IPhone X shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S21 FE. Both of them have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, a camera in the back with a 12 MP and the same 3840x2160 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.