Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a bit better than iPhone X, with a score of 95.4 against 88.1. Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than iPhone X, it's heavier and somewhat thicker. IPhone X has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and 5 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more vivid screen than iPhone X, because it has a bit more pixels per display inch, a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a way brighter screen and a larger display. The iPhone X features a very superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than iPhone X, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a camera with way more megapixels, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much larger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a very superior battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a little more money than the Apple iPhone X, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.