Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-11-03 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.14 ounces | -- |
| Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Yes GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, having a overall score of 88.1 against 80.2. IPhone X features a sharper screen than Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has a little worse screen pixels density, a way worse 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little bit smaller screen. The Galaxy S24 Ultra and iPhone X feature incredibly similar memory for games and applications, they have the same 256 GB internal storage.
Apple iPhone X counts with a lot better performance than Galaxy S24 Ultra, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and 5 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra features a superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
The Galaxy S24 Ultra has a bit better camera than iPhone X, because it has a way better 200 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.