Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-03 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.14 ounces | -- |
| Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Yes GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is just a bit better than the Galaxy S25, with an 88.1 score against 82.6. IPhone X counts with a very superior processing unit than Galaxy S25, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and 5 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Galaxy S25 counts with a little more vivid screen than iPhone X, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little inferior pixel number in each screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger display and a way brighter screen.
The Apple iPhone X features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S25, because it has more internal storage. Galaxy S25 counts with a way better battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 47 percent larger battery size. Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots greater pictures and videos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a camera in the back with much more megapixels, a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Apple iPhone X is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S25, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.