Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-03 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.14 ounces | -- |
| Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Yes GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than the iPhone X's 88.1 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is lighter and noticeably thinner than iPhone X. The Apple iPhone X counts with a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a brighter screen than iPhone X, because it has a bigger display, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, way more brightness and a bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot better camera than iPhone X, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot higher video quality.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with as much storage for games and applications as the iPhone X one, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much longer battery life than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.