Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2021-03-12 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is much better than Galaxy XCover 5, getting a global score of 88.1 against 78.1. Even though the iPhone X is much older and just a bit heavier than Galaxy XCover 5, it's design is still somewhat thinner. The iPhone X counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a higher pixel quantity per inch of screen, a lot higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a little larger screen.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The iPhone X has a greater processing power than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has 2 lesser cores and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone X shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a lot lower resolution camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution. Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 features a bit longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 10 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.