Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 general score. The iPhone X construction is noticeably lighter and a lot thinner than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it was released 5 years before. Apple iPhone X counts with a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has less RAM and less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher amount of pixels per display inch and a quite better 1125 x 2436px resolution. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features more storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity. Apple iPhone X features a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower resolution, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a lot larger sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.