Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 overall score. IPhone X's design is thinner and lighter than the Galaxy XCover Pro, even though it was released many years before. Apple iPhone X counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixels count in each screen inch and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels.
IPhone X has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Apple iPhone X features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone X has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs or videos in low-light situations and a back-facing camera with much less MP, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the iPhone X, otherwise you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.