Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is a little bit better than the Apple iPhone X's overall score of 88.1. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a notably newer and a little bit thinner phone than Apple iPhone X, although it is a bit heavier. IPhone X counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less and slower cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone X counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel amount per inch in the screen. IPhone X and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip feature incredibly similar memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, they have equal 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with superior battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Z Flip shoots a bit better pictures and videos than iPhone X, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 megapixels resolution, a same size aperture, the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a bigger camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs more than the iPhone X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as iPhone X. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get iPhone X, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.