Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy Z Flip 3's 85.6 overall score. The Apple iPhone X is a noticeably older and a little bit thicker device than Galaxy Z Flip 3, but Apple managed to build it a little bit lighter anyway. The Apple iPhone X features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone X counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little lower 1125 x 2436 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. The iPhone X takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both of them have a same size camera aperture and the same resolution back facing camera.
The iPhone X has a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has improved battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Apple iPhone X costs a little more money than Galaxy Z Flip 3, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.