Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit better than the iPhone X, getting a 92.3 score against 88.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is newer and a little bit thinner, but also a bit heavier than the iPhone X. The Apple iPhone X features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density.
IPhone X and Galaxy Z Flip 5G both count with very similar memory capacity for applications and games, they have equal internal memory capacity. Apple iPhone X features a bit better processing power than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory and lesser and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes just a bit better videos and photos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same resolution back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features longer battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.