Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a bit better than iPhone X, having a global score of 94.6 against 88.1. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is notably heavier than iPhone X, it's just a bit thinner and noticeably newer. The iPhone X features a bit superior processor than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 9 GB less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone X features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit lower 1125 x 2436 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures clearer photographs and videos than iPhone X, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rate, the same resolution camera and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a much bigger camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's storage to store more games and applications is just as good as the iPhone X one, both of them have exactly the same internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than iPhone X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as iPhone X. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the iPhone X, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.